SPL Private Finance (PF1) IC Ltd & Ors v Arch Financial Products LLP [2015] EWHC 1124 (Comm) (16 January 2015)

SPL Private Finance (PF1) IC Ltd & Ors v Arch Financial Products LLP [2015] EWHC 1124 (Comm) (16 January 2015)

The claimants established a real risk of dissipation of assets by Mr Farrell, supported by findings of dishonesty, suspicious asset transfers, and lack of adequate disclosure, justifying continuation of the worldwide freezing order and ancillary relief.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] EWHC 1124 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: SPL Private Finance (PF1) IC Limited and 17 others; Defendant: Arch Financial Products LLP; Claimant: SPL Private Finance (PF2) IC Limited and 5 others; Defendant: Robin Farrell
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 January 2015
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Proceedings (post Judgment Applications) / Return Date Hearing for Continuation of Worldwide Post Judgment Freezing Order and Ancillary Relief
Outcome
Application granted for continuation of worldwide post-judgment freezing order and ancillary relief.
Legal Topics
Freezing Injunctions, Post Judgment Relief, Asset Disclosure, Risk of Dissipation, Ancillary Orders, Permission for Foreign Freezing Orders, Use of Disclosed Documents
Commercial Law Insolvency Law Civil Procedure Freezing Injunctions Post Judgment Relief Asset Disclosure Risk of Dissipation Ancillary Orders +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SPL Private Finance (PF1) IC Limited and 17 others

Claimant

Arch Financial Products LLP

Defendant

SPL Private Finance (PF2) IC Limited and 5 others

Claimant

Robin Farrell

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Proceedings (post Judgment Applications) / Return Date Hearing for Continuation of Worldwide Post Judgment Freezing Order and Ancillary Relief

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the worldwide post-judgment freezing order against Mr Farrell should be continued or set aside
  2. 2 Whether further asset disclosure should be ordered
  3. 3 Whether permission should be granted to seek a freezing order in Guernsey

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants established a real risk of dissipation of assets by Mr Farrell, supported by findings of dishonesty, suspicious asset transfers, and lack of adequate disclosure, justifying continuation of the worldwide freezing order and ancillary relief.

Court Disposition

Application granted for continuation of worldwide post-judgment freezing order and ancillary relief.

Orders

  • Continuation of the worldwide freezing order against Mr Farrell.
  • Order for further disclosure of assets by Mr Farrell, including details of trusts and explanation of asset reduction.