Plymouth & South West Co-Operative Society Ltd v Architecture, Structure & Management Ltd (No 2) [2006] EWHC 3252 (TCC) (18 December 2006)
The insurers determined, funded, and conducted ASM's defence solely in their own interests after ASM had ceased trading, and but for their actions, PSW would have recovered its judgment and costs directly from the insurers with minimal expense. All five exceptional factors for a non-party costs order were present, justifying an order that each insurer pay 20% of the recoverable costs.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 3252 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Plymouth & South West Co-Operative Society Limited; Defendant: Architecture, Structure & Management Limited; Non Party (costs): Ecclesiastical Insurance Office PLC; Non Party (costs): International Insurance Company of Hannover Ltd; Non Party (costs): UN Management Company of Unionamerica Insurance Co Ltd; Non Party (costs): CX Reinsurance Company Ltd; Non Party (costs): Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Non Party Costs Order / Post Judgment, Costs Application
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Non Party Costs Orders, Professional Indemnity Insurance, Third Parties (rights Against Insurers) Act 1930, Section 51 Supreme Court Act 1981, Costs Liability of Insurers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plymouth & South West Co-Operative Society Limited
Claimant
Architecture, Structure & Management Limited
Defendant
Ecclesiastical Insurance Office PLC
Non Party (costs)
International Insurance Company of Hannover Ltd
Non Party (costs)
UN Management Company of Unionamerica Insurance Co Ltd
Non Party (costs)
CX Reinsurance Company Ltd
Non Party (costs)
Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC
Non Party (costs)
Procedural Posture
Application for Non Party Costs Order / Post Judgment, Costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-party costs orders should be made against insurers under section 51 Supreme Court Act 1981
- 2 Whether exceptional circumstances exist justifying such orders
- 3 Whether insurers' conduct caused the claimant's loss of costs recovery
Ratio Decidendi
The insurers determined, funded, and conducted ASM's defence solely in their own interests after ASM had ceased trading, and but for their actions, PSW would have recovered its judgment and costs directly from the insurers with minimal expense. All five exceptional factors for a non-party costs order were present, justifying an order that each insurer pay 20% of the recoverable costs.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Each insurer joined as non-party for costs purposes under section 51 Supreme Court Act 1981.
- Each insurer to pay 20% of the overall recoverable costs from ASM to PSW, subject to detailed assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment