Crest Nicholson Regeneration Limited & Ors v Ardmore Construction Limited (in Administration) & Ors
Permission to appeal refused as BLO Defendants failed to demonstrate real prospect of success or compelling reason; stay of execution and extended time to pay denied due to lack of credible evidence of inability to pay; interest awarded at 5% from 5 September 2025; Crest awarded 100% of costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: Crest Nicholson Regeneration Limited; Claimant: Crest Nicholson (South) Limited; Claimant: Crest Nicholson Operations Limited; Claimant: Crest Nicholson PLC; Defendant: Ardmore Construction Limited (in administration); Defendant: David Richmond and Partners Limited; Defendant: Yuanda (UK) Co. Limited; Defendant: Ardmore Construction Group Limited; Defendant: Ardmore Group Limited; Defendant: Ardmore Group Holdings Limited; Defendant: Paddington Construction Limited; Defendant: Ardmore Fitout Limited; Defendant: Celebration Homes Limited; Defendant: Byrne Properties Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Consequential Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused; stay of execution and extended time to pay denied; interest and full costs awarded to Crest.
- Legal Topics
- Building Liability Orders, Defective Premises Act, Building Safety Act, Stay of Execution, Interest on Judgment, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crest Nicholson Regeneration Limited
Claimant
Crest Nicholson (South) Limited
Claimant
Crest Nicholson Operations Limited
Claimant
Crest Nicholson PLC
Claimant
Ardmore Construction Limited (in administration)
Defendant
David Richmond and Partners Limited
Defendant
Yuanda (UK) Co. Limited
Defendant
Ardmore Construction Group Limited
Defendant
Ardmore Group Limited
Defendant
Ardmore Group Holdings Limited
Defendant
Paddington Construction Limited
Defendant
Ardmore Fitout Limited
Defendant
Celebration Homes Limited
Defendant
Byrne Properties Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Consequential Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted for anticipatory and adjudication BLOs
- 2 Whether a stay of execution or extended time to pay should be granted
- 3 Entitlement to interest on sums awarded
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal refused as BLO Defendants failed to demonstrate real prospect of success or compelling reason; stay of execution and extended time to pay denied due to lack of credible evidence of inability to pay; interest awarded at 5% from 5 September 2025; Crest awarded 100% of costs.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused; stay of execution and extended time to pay denied; interest and full costs awarded to Crest.
Orders
- BLO Defendants must pay Crest within 14 days of judgment date.
- Interest at 5% from 5 September 2025 awarded to Crest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment