Argos Ltd v Argos Systems Inc
Argos Limited's claims failed because (1) it consented to the display of its ads on Argos Systems Inc's website via Google AdWords terms; (2) Argos Systems Inc's website and use of the sign ARGOS were not targeted at the UK or used in relation to identical services; (3) there was no adverse effect on the functions of the trade mark, no relevant link or injury, and no unfair advantage or lack of due cause; (4) the own name defence and honest practices applied; and (5) there was no actionable misrepresentation or damage for passing off.
- Parties
- Claimant: Argos Limited; Defendant: Argos Systems Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property/trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; counterclaim for declarations of non-infringement succeeds; indemnity claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Consent in Trade Mark Law, Targeting in Internet Law, Google Ad Words/ad Sense Liability, Own Name Defence, Due Cause, Unfair Advantage, Dilution, Jurisdiction and Targeting, Instrument of Fraud, Indemnity Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Argos Limited
Claimant
Argos Systems Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property/trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Argos Systems Inc's use of the domain name argos.com and display of Google AdSense ads infringed Argos Limited's EU trade marks under Articles 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(c) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation
- 2 Whether Argos Systems Inc's conduct amounted to passing off under UK law
- 3 Whether Argos Limited consented to the acts complained of via participation in Google AdWords
Ratio Decidendi
Argos Limited's claims failed because (1) it consented to the display of its ads on Argos Systems Inc's website via Google AdWords terms; (2) Argos Systems Inc's website and use of the sign ARGOS were not targeted at the UK or used in relation to identical services; (3) there was no adverse effect on the functions of the trade mark, no relevant link or injury, and no unfair advantage or lack of due cause; (4) the own name defence and honest practices applied; and (5) there was no actionable misrepresentation or damage for passing off.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; counterclaim for declarations of non-infringement succeeds; indemnity claim dismissed.
Orders
- Argos Limited's claims for trade mark infringement and passing off are dismissed.
- Declarations of non-infringement granted in favour of Argos Systems Inc.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment