R v Arjon Osmani & Anor

R v Arjon Osmani & Anor

The appellants' roles were squarely within the lesser role category, with no evidence of significant financial gain or knowledge of unlawful electricity use, warranting reduced sentences and no aggravation for electricity abstraction.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Arjon Osmani; Appellant: Rustem Kulla
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
Outcome
sentences quashed and substituted
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Controlled Drugs, Culpability Assessment, Mitigating Factors
Criminal Law Sentencing Controlled Drugs Culpability Assessment Mitigating Factors

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Arjon Osmani

Appellant

Rustem Kulla

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants' roles were properly categorised as lesser or significant for sentencing purposes
  2. 2 Whether unlawful access to electricity was an aggravating factor for the appellants
  3. 3 Appropriate sentence reduction for guilty pleas

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants' roles were squarely within the lesser role category, with no evidence of significant financial gain or knowledge of unlawful electricity use, warranting reduced sentences and no aggravation for electricity abstraction.

Court Disposition

sentences quashed and substituted

Orders

  • Arjon Osmani: 8 months' imprisonment substituted
  • Rustem Kulla: 7 months' imprisonment substituted