Newton-Sealey v Armorgroup Services Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 233 (QB) (14 February 2008)

Newton-Sealey v Armorgroup Services Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 233 (QB) (14 February 2008)

There is no real prospect of the claimant establishing a contract of employment with AG (UK) or AG plc, as the contract was clearly with AG (Jersey) and there is no necessity to imply additional contracts. However, there is a real prospect of the claimant establishing that AG (UK) and AG plc owed him a duty of care in negligence, based on the special relationship, the manner of recruitment, operational control, and involvement in equipment procurement, such that the claims in tort should proceed to trial.

Citation
[2008] EWHC 233
Parties
Claimant: David Newton-Sealey (by his litigation friend, Rachel Margetts); Defendant: ArmorGroup Services Ltd; Defendant: ArmorGroup Services (Jersey) Ltd; Defendant: ArmorGroup Services International Plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Judgment And/or Strike Out / Interlocutory (application for Reverse Summary Judgment or Strike Out, Not Trial of Action)
Outcome
Summary judgment and strike out refused in respect of tort claims; granted in respect of contract claims against AG (UK) and AG plc.
Legal Topics
Enterprise Liability, Corporate Group Liability, Duty of Care, Implied Contract, Negligence, Personal Injury, Vicarious Liability, Temporary Employment, Assumption of Responsibility
Tort Law Contract Law Employment Law Corporate Law Enterprise Liability Corporate Group Liability Duty of Care Implied Contract +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Newton-Sealey (by his litigation friend, Rachel Margetts)

Claimant

ArmorGroup Services Ltd

Defendant

ArmorGroup Services (Jersey) Ltd

Defendant

ArmorGroup Services International Plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Summary Judgment And/or Strike Out / Interlocutory (application for Reverse Summary Judgment or Strike Out, Not Trial of Action)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether members of a corporate group other than the direct employer can be liable in contract or tort for personal injuries to an employee
  2. 2 Whether a contract of employment can be implied with other group companies
  3. 3 Whether a duty of care in negligence is owed by group companies other than the employer

Ratio Decidendi

There is no real prospect of the claimant establishing a contract of employment with AG (UK) or AG plc, as the contract was clearly with AG (Jersey) and there is no necessity to imply additional contracts. However, there is a real prospect of the claimant establishing that AG (UK) and AG plc owed him a duty of care in negligence, based on the special relationship, the manner of recruitment, operational control, and involvement in equipment procurement, such that the claims in tort should proceed to trial.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment and strike out refused in respect of tort claims; granted in respect of contract claims against AG (UK) and AG plc.

Orders

  • Claims in contract against AG (UK) and AG plc struck out or summary judgment granted for defendants on those claims.
  • Claims in tort (negligence) against AG (UK) and AG plc to proceed to trial.