Newton-Sealey v Armorgroup Services Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 233 (QB) (14 February 2008)

Newton-Sealey v Armorgroup Services Ltd & Ors [2008] EWHC 233 (QB) (14 February 2008)

There is no real prospect of the claimant establishing a contract of employment with AG (UK) or AG plc, nor is it necessary for efficacy to imply such a contract. However, there is a real prospect of the claimant establishing that AG (UK) and AG plc owed him a duty of care in negligence, based on the recruitment process, operational control, equipment procurement, and the presentation of the group as a single enterprise. The applications for summary judgment or strike out by AG (UK) and AG plc are refused in respect of the negligence claim.

Citation
[2008] EWHC 233 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: David Newton-Sealey (by his litigation friend, Rachel Margetts); Defendant: ArmorGroup Services Ltd; Defendant: ArmorGroup Services (Jersey) Ltd; Defendant: ArmorGroup Services International Plc
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/employer's Liability / Application for Summary Judgment or Strike Out by Two Defendants
Outcome
Summary judgment and strike out refused as regards the negligence claim; allowed as regards the contract claim.
Legal Topics
Enterprise Liability, Corporate Group Liability, Duty of Care, Contract of Employment, Negligence, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications
Tort Law Employment Law Company Law Enterprise Liability Corporate Group Liability Duty of Care Contract of Employment Negligence +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Newton-Sealey (by his litigation friend, Rachel Margetts)

Claimant

ArmorGroup Services Ltd

Defendant

ArmorGroup Services (Jersey) Ltd

Defendant

ArmorGroup Services International Plc

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury/employer's Liability / Application for Summary Judgment or Strike Out by Two Defendants

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether members of a corporate group other than the claimant's contractual employer can be liable in contract or tort for personal injuries sustained by the claimant
  2. 2 Whether a contract of employment can be implied with other group members
  3. 3 Whether a duty of care in negligence is owed by other group members

Ratio Decidendi

There is no real prospect of the claimant establishing a contract of employment with AG (UK) or AG plc, nor is it necessary for efficacy to imply such a contract. However, there is a real prospect of the claimant establishing that AG (UK) and AG plc owed him a duty of care in negligence, based on the recruitment process, operational control, equipment procurement, and the presentation of the group as a single enterprise. The applications for summary judgment or strike out by AG (UK) and AG plc are refused in respect of the negligence claim.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment and strike out refused as regards the negligence claim; allowed as regards the contract claim.

Orders

  • The claims in contract against AG (UK) and AG plc are struck out or dismissed by summary judgment.
  • The claims in negligence against AG (UK) and AG plc may proceed to trial.