Investec Bank (UK) Ltd v Zulman & Anor

Investec Bank (UK) Ltd v Zulman & Anor

Clause 3.1 of the Guarantee is clear and unambiguous: the Defendants are only liable if Ashbury’s indebtedness exceeds £2,000,000 at the time of demand. After the reduction of the loan, this threshold was not met. There was no binding oral agreement, no effective variation by the Variation Letter, no estoppel, and no basis for rectification. The Bank’s claim fails.

Parties
Claimant: Investec Bank (UK) Limited; Defendant: Arnold Zulman; Defendant: David Zulman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim (bank Guarantee Enforcement) / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed; judgment for the Defendants.
Legal Topics
Guarantee Enforcement, Rectification, Estoppel, Contract Construction
Contract Law Banking Law Guarantee Enforcement Rectification Estoppel Contract Construction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Investec Bank (UK) Limited

Claimant

Arnold Zulman

Defendant

David Zulman

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Claim (bank Guarantee Enforcement) / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether clause 3.1 of the Guarantee precludes liability if Ashbury's indebtedness is less than £2,000,000
  2. 2 Whether the Guarantee should be rectified
  3. 3 Whether there was an oral agreement to vary the Guarantee

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 3.1 of the Guarantee is clear and unambiguous: the Defendants are only liable if Ashbury’s indebtedness exceeds £2,000,000 at the time of demand. After the reduction of the loan, this threshold was not met. There was no binding oral agreement, no effective variation by the Variation Letter, no estoppel, and no basis for rectification. The Bank’s claim fails.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; judgment for the Defendants.