Arora v Anas

Arora v Anas

The application for permission to appeal was refused because the grounds raised did not have a real prospect of success, did not raise any important point of principle or practice, and the factual findings and procedural conduct below were not erroneous or unjust.

Parties
Applicant: Arora; Respondent: Anas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 January 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Bring a Second Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Tenancy Termination, Section 21 Notice, Tenancy Deposit Scheme, Appeal Procedure
Landlord and Tenant Law Tenancy Termination Section 21 Notice Tenancy Deposit Scheme Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arora

Applicant

Anas

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Bring a Second Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tenancy was validly terminated under the Housing Act 1988
  2. 2 Whether the section 21 notice was properly served
  3. 3 Whether the deposit was repaid in accordance with the Housing Act 2004

Ratio Decidendi

The application for permission to appeal was refused because the grounds raised did not have a real prospect of success, did not raise any important point of principle or practice, and the factual findings and procedural conduct below were not erroneous or unjust.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal is refused