Coghlan v Bailey

Coghlan v Bailey

The court found that while the statement made by Daniel Bailey was false and misleading, it was not established beyond reasonable doubt that he had no honest belief in its truth. The court concluded that the inaccuracies were more likely due to carelessness and lack of thorough investigation rather than dishonesty or intent to mislead. Therefore, the application for committal for contempt was dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Arran Coghlan; Respondent: Daniel Bailey
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application / Judgment After Full Hearing
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, False Statements, Witness Evidence, Proceeds of Crime
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Contempt of Court False Statements Witness Evidence Proceeds of Crime

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arran Coghlan

Applicant

Daniel Bailey

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court Application / Judgment After Full Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Daniel Bailey made a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without honest belief in its truth, amounting to contempt of court

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the statement made by Daniel Bailey was false and misleading, it was not established beyond reasonable doubt that he had no honest belief in its truth. The court concluded that the inaccuracies were more likely due to carelessness and lack of thorough investigation rather than dishonesty or intent to mislead. Therefore, the application for committal for contempt was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed