Banks v Revenue And Customs [2021] EWCA Civ 1439 (06 October 2021)
Section 24 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 does not discriminate, either directly or indirectly, against donors to political parties without MPs at the last general election on grounds of political opinion or 'other status' within Article 14 ECHR. The statutory criteria are neutral and apply equally to all parties. Any difference in treatment is objectively justified by the legitimate aim of supporting parties with established parliamentary representation. There is no breach of Articles 10 or 11 ECHR, and section 24 cannot be interpreted compatibly with Convention rights in a manner that would alter its fundamental operation. The appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Civ 1439
- Parties
- Appellant: Arron Banks; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance Tax, Political Donations, Article 14 ECHR, Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Association, Discrimination, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arron Banks
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 24 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 discriminates against donors to political parties without MPs at the last general election, contrary to Article 14 ECHR read with Article 1 Protocol 1 (A1P1)
- 2 Whether the discrimination is direct or indirect on grounds of political opinion or 'other status'
- 3 Whether any discrimination is objectively justified
Ratio Decidendi
Section 24 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 does not discriminate, either directly or indirectly, against donors to political parties without MPs at the last general election on grounds of political opinion or 'other status' within Article 14 ECHR. The statutory criteria are neutral and apply equally to all parties. Any difference in treatment is objectively justified by the legitimate aim of supporting parties with established parliamentary representation. There is no breach of Articles 10 or 11 ECHR, and section 24 cannot be interpreted compatibly with Convention rights in a manner that would alter its fundamental operation. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No declaration of incompatibility is made.
- Section 24 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 remains in force as enacted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment