R v Mcdonagh & Anor

R v Mcdonagh & Anor

The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive given the aggravating and mitigating features; proper discount for guilty plea and reduction in victim surcharge were warranted; custodial sentences were justified but at reduced terms.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Arthur McDonagh; Appellant: Michael Gerard Lawrence
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Theft, Sentencing, Deterrence, Discount for Guilty Plea
Criminal Law Theft Sentencing Deterrence Discount for Guilty Plea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Arthur McDonagh

Appellant

Michael Gerard Lawrence

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigating factors
  3. 3 Whether the judge erred in departing from Sentencing Guidelines based on local prevalence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive given the aggravating and mitigating features; proper discount for guilty plea and reduction in victim surcharge were warranted; custodial sentences were justified but at reduced terms.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentences quashed
  • Substituted sentence: McDonagh - 2 months' detention in young offender institution