R v Arthur McDonagh

R v Arthur McDonagh

The sentence of two months' imprisonment suspended for 12 months was not manifestly excessive, was within the guideline range for a Category 1A offence, and was proportionate given the use of a weapon, the victim's fear, and aggravating factors. The application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused.

Parties
Applicant: Arthur McDonagh; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Public Order Offences, Use of Weapons, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Public Order Offences Use of Weapons Appeal Against Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arthur McDonagh

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge properly applied the Sentencing Council guidelines
  3. 3 Whether appropriate reduction was given for a guilty plea

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of two months' imprisonment suspended for 12 months was not manifestly excessive, was within the guideline range for a Category 1A offence, and was proportionate given the use of a weapon, the victim's fear, and aggravating factors. The application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal against sentence refused

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused.