Decker, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1752 (03 November 2017)
The making of a deportation order under the Immigration Act 1971 does not require the subject to be present in the UK; however, the refusal to issue an EEA residence card was flawed as neither the Secretary of State nor the First Tier Tribunal applied the correct legal test under Regulation 21, failing to assess whether the appellant posed a genuine, present, and sufficiently serious threat affecting fundamental interests of society.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 1752
- Parties
- Appellant: Arthur Obafemi Cecil Decker; First Respondent: Secretary of State for The Home Department; Second Respondent: The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed on the validity of the deportation order; appeal allowed on the EEA residence card issue; matter remitted for reconsideration by the Upper Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Deportation Orders, EEA Residence Cards, Citizens' Directive 2004/38/ec, Immigration Act 1971, Public Policy Grounds for Refusal, Judicial Review Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arthur Obafemi Cecil Decker
Appellant
Secretary of State for The Home Department
First Respondent
The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a deportation order is invalid if made while the subject is outside the UK
- 2 Whether the refusal to issue an EEA residence card applied the correct legal test under Article 27 of the Citizens' Directive and Regulation 21 of the 2006 Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The making of a deportation order under the Immigration Act 1971 does not require the subject to be present in the UK; however, the refusal to issue an EEA residence card was flawed as neither the Secretary of State nor the First Tier Tribunal applied the correct legal test under Regulation 21, failing to assess whether the appellant posed a genuine, present, and sufficiently serious threat affecting fundamental interests of society.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed on the validity of the deportation order; appeal allowed on the EEA residence card issue; matter remitted for reconsideration by the Upper Tribunal.
Orders
- The appeal on the validity of the deportation order is dismissed.
- The appeal on the EEA residence card issue is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment