Chandler v O'Connor [2019] EWHC 3181 (QB) (22 November 2019)

Chandler v O'Connor [2019] EWHC 3181 (QB) (22 November 2019)

Given the seriousness of the defamatory allegations, the Defendant's refusal to engage, and the absence of evidence of significant publication or reputational harm, the Claimant is entitled to the maximum summary damages of £10,000 and an order requiring the Defendant to publish a correction/apology or, failing agreement, a summary of the judgment.

Citation
[2019] EWHC 3181
Parties
Claimant: Christopher Chandler; Defendant: Arthur O'Connor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Defamation (libel) Claim / Summary Relief Application After Default Judgment
Outcome
Claimant's application for summary relief granted.
Legal Topics
Libel on Social Media, Summary Disposal of Defamation Claims, Damages Assessment, Correction and Apology Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Chandler

Claimant

Arthur O'Connor

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation (libel) Claim / Summary Relief Application After Default Judgment

  1. 1 Whether summary relief under ss.8-10 Defamation Act 1996 is appropriate after default judgment in a libel claim
  2. 2 Assessment of damages for defamatory tweets
  3. 3 Entitlement to order for correction/apology or summary of judgment

Ratio Decidendi

Given the seriousness of the defamatory allegations, the Defendant's refusal to engage, and the absence of evidence of significant publication or reputational harm, the Claimant is entitled to the maximum summary damages of £10,000 and an order requiring the Defendant to publish a correction/apology or, failing agreement, a summary of the judgment.

Court Disposition

Claimant's application for summary relief granted.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay £10,000 in damages to the Claimant.
  • Defendant to publish a suitable correction and apology (if agreed) or, failing agreement, a summary of the Court's judgment as directed by the Court.