Littlehampton Harbour Board, R (On the Application Of) v Arun District Council [2024] EWHC 3293 (Admin) (18 December 2024)
Section 19 of the West Sussex County Council Act 1972 includes any lawful expenditure for statutory purposes, including capital expenditure, subject to the s.21 duty and Bromley principles; the Defendant erred in law by construing s.19 as limited to budgetary balancing and excluding capital expenditure.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3293 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Littlehampton Harbour Board; Defendant: Arun District Council; Interested Party: West Sussex County Council; Interested Party: Department for Transport
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; decision of Arun District Council quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Construction, Fiduciary Duty, Public Finance, Harbour Authority Duties, Business Principles in Public Bodies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Littlehampton Harbour Board
Claimant
Arun District Council
Defendant
West Sussex County Council
Interested Party
Department for Transport
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether capital expenditure for infrastructure works falls within the scope of s.19 of the West Sussex County Council Act 1972
- 2 Whether Arun District Council erred in law by refusing to pay sums requested under s.19
- 3 Application of Bromley principles and s.21 duty to harbour board financial requests
Ratio Decidendi
Section 19 of the West Sussex County Council Act 1972 includes any lawful expenditure for statutory purposes, including capital expenditure, subject to the s.21 duty and Bromley principles; the Defendant erred in law by construing s.19 as limited to budgetary balancing and excluding capital expenditure.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; decision of Arun District Council quashed.
Orders
- Impugned decision quashed; Defendant to respond to updated request from Claimant in accordance with judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment