Littlehampton Harbour Board v Arun District Council

Littlehampton Harbour Board v Arun District Council

Section 19 of the West Sussex County Council Act 1972 permits the Claimant to request contributions from the Defendant for any lawful expenditure required for statutory purposes, including capital expenditure, subject to the s.21 duty to operate on business principles and the Bromley principles. The Defendant erred in law by construing s.19 as limited to operational shortfalls and refusing to pay the requested sums for capital expenditure.

Parties
Claimant: Littlehampton Harbour Board; Defendant: Arun District Council; Interested Party: West Sussex County Council; Interested Party: Department for Transport
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim allowed; impugned decision quashed
Legal Topics
Statutory Construction of Local Authority Funding Obligations, Fiduciary Duties of Local Authorities, Harbour Authority Statutory Duties, Application of Bromley Principles, Judicial Review of Council Decisions
Administrative Law Local Government Law Statutory Interpretation Statutory Construction of Local Authority Funding Obligations Fiduciary Duties of Local Authorities Harbour Authority Statutory Duties Application of Bromley Principles Judicial Review of Council Decisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Littlehampton Harbour Board

Claimant

Arun District Council

Defendant

West Sussex County Council

Interested Party

Department for Transport

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Arun District Council erred in law in refusing to pay sums requested under s.19 of the West Sussex County Council Act 1972 for capital expenditure by Littlehampton Harbour Board
  2. 2 Whether s.19 of the 1972 Act permits requests for capital expenditure or is limited to operational shortfalls
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant breached its s.21 duty or the Bromley principles

Ratio Decidendi

Section 19 of the West Sussex County Council Act 1972 permits the Claimant to request contributions from the Defendant for any lawful expenditure required for statutory purposes, including capital expenditure, subject to the s.21 duty to operate on business principles and the Bromley principles. The Defendant erred in law by construing s.19 as limited to operational shortfalls and refusing to pay the requested sums for capital expenditure.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed; impugned decision quashed

Orders

  • The Defendant’s decision refusing to pay the requested sums under s.19 is quashed.
  • The Claimant may submit an updated request for contributions, to which the Defendant must respond in accordance with the judgment.