Asad Bhatti v R
The judge's direction on the significance of lies was adequate and protected against improper reasoning by the jury. The evidence regarding the absence of a certificate was admissible and the judge's direction on its significance was more favourable to the appellant than required. The convictions are safe.
- Parties
- Appellant: Asad Bhatti; Respondent: The King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld
- Legal Topics
- Explosive Substances, Terrorism Offences, Jury Directions, Admissibility of Evidence, Lucas Direction, Lies in Criminal Trials
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asad Bhatti
Appellant
The King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge gave an adequate direction to the jury regarding lies told by the appellant (Lucas direction)
- 2 Whether evidence of the appellant's failure to obtain a certificate for explosives was admissible and properly directed
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's direction on the significance of lies was adequate and protected against improper reasoning by the jury. The evidence regarding the absence of a certificate was admissible and the judge's direction on its significance was more favourable to the appellant than required. The convictions are safe.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; convictions upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment