Ashdown Forest Economic Development Llp v (1) Wealden District Council (2) South Downs National Park Authority
Policy WCS12, in so far as it relates to the 7 km zone, was adopted in breach of the duty under regulation 12 of the SEA Regulations because the Council failed to consider reasonable alternatives; the Habitats Regulations Assessment did not constitute such consideration.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ashdown Forest Economic Development LLP; Respondent: Wealden District Council; Respondent: South Downs National Park Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Strategic Environmental Assessment, Habitats Directive, Local Plan Policy, Assessment of Alternatives, Quashing Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashdown Forest Economic Development LLP
Appellant
Wealden District Council
Respondent
South Downs National Park Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council breached its duty under the SEA Regulations by failing to assess reasonable alternatives to the 7 km zone in policy WCS12
Ratio Decidendi
Policy WCS12, in so far as it relates to the 7 km zone, was adopted in breach of the duty under regulation 12 of the SEA Regulations because the Council failed to consider reasonable alternatives; the Habitats Regulations Assessment did not constitute such consideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Quashing order granted, limited to the part of policy WCS12 relating to the 7 km zone
- Precise form of order to be agreed between counsel or by written submissions if disagreement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment