Social Work England v Asheba Falasha Golding

Social Work England v Asheba Falasha Golding

The necessity and proportionality of a 12-month extension of the interim conditions of practice order outweigh the prejudice to the respondent, given public protection, public confidence, and the reasonable progression of proceedings.

Parties
Claimant: Social Work England; Defendant: Asheba Falasha Golding
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Conditions of Practice Order
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Interim Conditions of Practice Order, Professional Regulation, Delay in Proceedings
Administrative Law Regulatory Law Extension of Interim Conditions of Practice Order Professional Regulation Delay in Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Social Work England

Claimant

Asheba Falasha Golding

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Conditions of Practice Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a 12-month extension of the interim conditions of practice order is necessary and proportionate
  2. 2 Whether the delay in proceedings justifies a shorter extension

Ratio Decidendi

The necessity and proportionality of a 12-month extension of the interim conditions of practice order outweigh the prejudice to the respondent, given public protection, public confidence, and the reasonable progression of proceedings.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Interim conditions of practice order extended for 12 months to 9 May 2024
  • No order as to costs