Bellamile Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Ashford Borough Council
The statutory six-week time limit for challenging a local plan under section 113 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 is strict and absolute, with no general discretion to extend. The claimant failed to provide a full, verified explanation for late filing and did not satisfy the test for exceptional extension on human rights grounds. The claim is unarguable on the merits.
- Parties
- Claimant: Bellamile Limited; Defendant: Ashford Borough Council; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application for permission to apply for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Time Limits, Local Plan Challenge, Extension of Time, Judicial Review Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bellamile Limited
Claimant
Ashford Borough Council
Defendant
Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to permission to apply for judicial review of policy 11a in the defendant’s local plan
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend the statutory time limit for filing a challenge under section 113 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
- 3 Whether the merits of the claim are relevant to the exercise of any exceptional jurisdiction to extend time
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory six-week time limit for challenging a local plan under section 113 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 is strict and absolute, with no general discretion to extend. The claimant failed to provide a full, verified explanation for late filing and did not satisfy the test for exceptional extension on human rights grounds. The claim is unarguable on the merits.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to apply for judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- Permission to apply for judicial review is refused.
- Procedural applications are not considered due to dismissal of the main application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment