Ashley Kevin Purdy v The Pensions Regulator

Ashley Kevin Purdy v The Pensions Regulator

The employer did not have a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. All correspondence was sent to the correct address, and there was no sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of service. The penalty amount is prescribed by law, and the Tribunal has no power to reduce it. Issuing the Penalty Notice was appropriate.

Parties
Appellant: Ashley Kevin Purdy; Respondent: The Pensions Regulator
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Pensions Regulatory Appeal / Final Decision on Reference
Outcome
reference dismissed
Legal Topics
Automatic Enrolment, Employer Duties, Fixed Penalty Notice, Compliance Notice, Statutory Presumptions of Service

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashley Kevin Purdy

Appellant

The Pensions Regulator

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Pensions Regulatory Appeal / Final Decision on Reference

  1. 1 Whether the employer had a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice
  2. 2 Whether the Fixed Penalty Notice was properly served and appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The employer did not have a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. All correspondence was sent to the correct address, and there was no sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of service. The penalty amount is prescribed by law, and the Tribunal has no power to reduce it. Issuing the Penalty Notice was appropriate.

Court Disposition

reference dismissed

Orders

  • The matter is remitted to the Regulator.
  • The penalty notice is confirmed.