Thomas v R [2020] EWCA Crim 2491 (25 March 2020)
The trial judge appropriately managed disclosure failures and improper cross-examination by halting questioning, ordering disclosure, and allowing the defence time to respond, ensuring no unfair prejudice to the appellant and the safety of the conviction.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] EWCA Crim 2491
- Parties
- Appellant: Ashley Thomas; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Imitation Firearm, Intent to Cause Fear of Violence, Possession With Intent to Supply, Disclosure Obligations, Jury Discharge, Trial Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashley Thomas
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to discharge the jury due to disclosure failures and cross-examination issues
- 2 Whether the appellant suffered unfair prejudice due to late disclosure and questioning on financial evidence and mobile phone access
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge appropriately managed disclosure failures and improper cross-examination by halting questioning, ordering disclosure, and allowing the defence time to respond, ensuring no unfair prejudice to the appellant and the safety of the conviction.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment