Ashu Mathia Ashu v The Information Commissioner

Ashu Mathia Ashu v The Information Commissioner

The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction under s. 166 DPA 2018 once the Information Commissioner has issued an outcome letter, as the complaint is no longer pending and there is no remedy the Tribunal can provide.

Parties
Applicant: Ashu Mathia Ashu; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Strike Out Determination
Outcome
Appeal struck out
Legal Topics
Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Procedural Remedies
Data Protection Information Rights Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018 Tribunal Jurisdiction Procedural Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashu Mathia Ashu

Applicant

The Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Strike Out Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction under s. 166 DPA 2018 after the Information Commissioner has issued an outcome letter
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Appeal has reasonable prospects of success

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction under s. 166 DPA 2018 once the Information Commissioner has issued an outcome letter, as the complaint is no longer pending and there is no remedy the Tribunal can provide.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out

Orders

  • The application to the Tribunal is struck out and will proceed no further.