Allergan, Inc & Anor v Aspire Pharma Ltd

Allergan, Inc & Anor v Aspire Pharma Ltd

The patent claims, including claim 18, are invalid for obviousness because the formulation of 0.01% bimatoprost with 0.02% BAK was obvious to the skilled team in light of Laibovitz and common general knowledge; there were no technical reasons to avoid 200 ppm BAK, and its use as a preservative and penetration enhancer was well-known.

Parties
Claimant: Allergan, Inc; Claimant: Allergan Limited; Defendant: Aspire Pharma Limited; Defendant: Accord Healthcare Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Validity / Final Judgment
Outcome
Patent invalidated for obviousness.
Legal Topics
Obviousness, Insufficiency, Pharmaceutical Formulation, Patent Amendment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Allergan, Inc

Claimant

Allergan Limited

Claimant

Aspire Pharma Limited

Defendant

Accord Healthcare Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Patent Infringement and Validity / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the patent claims are invalid for obviousness over prior art (Laibovitz)
  2. 2 Whether the patent claims are insufficient
  3. 3 Whether the proposed amendment (claim 18) cures obviousness

Ratio Decidendi

The patent claims, including claim 18, are invalid for obviousness because the formulation of 0.01% bimatoprost with 0.02% BAK was obvious to the skilled team in light of Laibovitz and common general knowledge; there were no technical reasons to avoid 200 ppm BAK, and its use as a preservative and penetration enhancer was well-known.

Court Disposition

Patent invalidated for obviousness.

Orders

  • Patent claims, including claim 18, are invalid.
  • No relief granted to Allergan.