Arogundade v Arogundade [2005] EWHC 1766 (Ch) (06 July 2005)

Arogundade v Arogundade [2005] EWHC 1766 (Ch) (06 July 2005)

The court found that the claimant did make substantial financial contributions towards the purchase of the property, both directly and through payments to Mr Sodiende, and that the defendant's denials were not credible in light of documentary evidence and inconsistencies. Therefore, the property is held on resulting...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] EWHC 1766 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Muinat Titilayo Arogundade; Defendant: Assan Arogundade
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim allowed in part
Legal Topics
Resulting Trusts, Beneficial Interests in Property, Land Registration, Cautions Against Title
Property Law Trusts Resulting Trusts Beneficial Interests in Property Land Registration Cautions Against Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muinat Titilayo Arogundade

Claimant

Assan Arogundade

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Civil Claim / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant contributed to the purchase price of 5 Grove Hall Court and is entitled to a beneficial interest under a resulting trust
  2. 2 Whether the caution registered by the claimant should continue or be cancelled

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant did make substantial financial contributions towards the purchase of the property, both directly and through payments to Mr Sodiende, and that the defendant's denials were not credible in light of documentary evidence and inconsistencies. Therefore, the property is held on resulting trust for both parties in shares reflecting their respective contributions.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part

Orders

  • Declaration that the defendant holds the property on trust for himself and the claimant in shares to be determined by the court
  • Order that the caution registered by the claimant is to continue to have effect