RSA Insurance Plc v Assicurazoni Generali SpA [2018] EWHC 1237 (QB) (15 May 2018)
The court held that the indemnity obligation under the insurance contract sounds in damages, not debt, and therefore RSA's claim for contribution against Generali falls within Section 1(1) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978. As such, the two-year limitation period under Section 10(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies. Since RSA's claim was brought more than two years after the right to contribution accrued (the date of settlement with Mr Merritt), the claim is statute barred.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 1237 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: RSA Insurance PLC; Defendant: Assicurazioni Generali SpA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (insurance Contribution) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed as statute barred
- Legal Topics
- Equitable Contribution, Limitation Periods, Indemnity Insurance, Mesothelioma Claims, Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RSA Insurance PLC
Claimant
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (insurance Contribution) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether RSA's claim for equitable contribution against Generali is statute barred under Section 10(1) of the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether the claim falls within Section 1(1) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978
- 3 Whether an insurer's obligation to indemnify under an insurance contract sounds in debt or damages
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the indemnity obligation under the insurance contract sounds in damages, not debt, and therefore RSA's claim for contribution against Generali falls within Section 1(1) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978. As such, the two-year limitation period under Section 10(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies. Since RSA's claim was brought more than two years after the right to contribution accrued (the date of settlement with Mr Merritt), the claim is statute barred.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed as statute barred
Orders
- Claim for equitable contribution against Generali is dismissed
- No order as to contribution calculation or reasonableness of settlement required
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment