Norwich Union Life & Pensions v Linpac Mouldings Ltd
Norwich Union reasonably withheld consent to the assignment of the leases to Linpac, as the break clauses were personal and could not be exercised by Linpac after assignment or upon re-acquisition; Linpac's right to break the leases was irretrievably lost upon assignment.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Norwich Union Life and Pensions Limited; Defendant/appellant: Linpac Mouldings Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; Norwich Union's refusal of consent was reasonable; Linpac cannot exercise the break clauses.
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Leases, Break Clauses, Reasonableness of Landlord's Consent, Interpretation of Lease Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norwich Union Life and Pensions Limited
Claimant/respondent
Linpac Mouldings Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Norwich Union unreasonably withheld consent to the assignment of the 1972 leases
- 2 Whether Linpac is entitled to exercise the break clauses to determine the leases after assignment or re-acquisition
Ratio Decidendi
Norwich Union reasonably withheld consent to the assignment of the leases to Linpac, as the break clauses were personal and could not be exercised by Linpac after assignment or upon re-acquisition; Linpac's right to break the leases was irretrievably lost upon assignment.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; Norwich Union's refusal of consent was reasonable; Linpac cannot exercise the break clauses.
Orders
- Norwich Union's refusal of consent to assignment upheld
- Linpac not entitled to exercise break clauses after assignment or re-acquisition
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment