King, Re [1963] EWCA Civ 1 (04 February 1963)
After assignment of the reversion, the assignor cannot sue the lessee for breaches of covenant to repair or reinstate, even if the breaches occurred before assignment; only the assignee can sue. Insurance moneys, where reinstatement is impossible, are to be divided between landlord and tenant according to their respective interests.
- Citation
- [1963] EWCA Civ 1
- Parties
- Original Lessor / Claimant / Appellant: Mr Edward Graves Tagg; Original Lessee: Mrs Elven; Lessee / Sub Lessor: Mr Richard Henry Francis Ling; Lessee (at Time of Fire, Deceased): Mr King; Defendants / Respondents: Executors of Mr King; Assignee / Purchaser / Interested Party: London County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claims by Mr Tagg dismissed; insurance moneys to be divided according to interests.
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Reversion, Covenants to Repair, Covenants to Reinstate, Insurance Proceeds, Compulsory Purchase, Damages for Breach of Covenant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Edward Graves Tagg
Original Lessor / Claimant / Appellant
Mrs Elven
Original Lessee
Mr Richard Henry Francis Ling
Lessee / Sub Lessor
Mr King
Lessee (at Time of Fire, Deceased)
Executors of Mr King
Defendants / Respondents
London County Council
Assignee / Purchaser / Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an assignor of a reversion can sue a lessee for breaches of covenant to repair or reinstate committed before assignment.
- 2 Entitlement to insurance moneys where reinstatement becomes impossible.
Ratio Decidendi
After assignment of the reversion, the assignor cannot sue the lessee for breaches of covenant to repair or reinstate, even if the breaches occurred before assignment; only the assignee can sue. Insurance moneys, where reinstatement is impossible, are to be divided between landlord and tenant according to their respective interests.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claims by Mr Tagg dismissed; insurance moneys to be divided according to interests.
Orders
- Mr Tagg's claim for damages against Mr King's executors dismissed.
- Declaration that only the assignee (London County Council) can sue for breaches of covenant to repair or reinstate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment