Morgan v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWHC 3960 (QB) (07 December 2018)
The current defence is struck out and amendments refused due to lack of clarity, particularity, and effective pleading; Defendant may reconsider and re-plead the honest opinion defence. Summary judgment is refused as the honest opinion defence cannot be said to have no real prospect of success at this stage.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3960 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Steve Morgan CBE; Defendant: Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Libel / Interlocutory Judgment on Amendment, Strike Out, and Summary Judgment Applications
- Outcome
- Defendant's current defence struck out; amendments refused; Defendant permitted to re-plead honest opinion defence; summary judgment application refused.
- Legal Topics
- Honest Opinion Defence, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Pleading Amendment, Section 3 Defamation Act 2013
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steve Morgan CBE
Claimant
Associated Newspapers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel / Interlocutory Judgment on Amendment, Strike Out, and Summary Judgment Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defence of honest opinion discloses reasonable grounds for defending the claim
- 2 Whether the Defendant's proposed amendments to the defence should be permitted
- 3 Whether summary judgment should be granted to the Claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The current defence is struck out and amendments refused due to lack of clarity, particularity, and effective pleading; Defendant may reconsider and re-plead the honest opinion defence. Summary judgment is refused as the honest opinion defence cannot be said to have no real prospect of success at this stage.
Court Disposition
Defendant's current defence struck out; amendments refused; Defendant permitted to re-plead honest opinion defence; summary judgment application refused.
Orders
- Strike out paragraphs 5 and 6 of Defendant's defence under CPR 3.4(2)
- Refuse permission to amend defence as proposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment