Blake v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2003] EWHC 1960 (QB) (31 July 2003)

Blake v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2003] EWHC 1960 (QB) (31 July 2003)

The action must be stayed because the core issues are non-justiciable; the court cannot determine the validity of the claimant's consecration as a bishop without entering forbidden territory of doctrinal and ecclesiastical matters, making a fair trial impossible.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 1960
Parties
Claimant: The Right Reverend Jonathan Clive Blake; Defendant: Associated Newspapers Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Preliminary Issues Hearing on Justiciability and Stay
Outcome
Action stayed
Legal Topics
Libel, Non Justiciability, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Expression, Stay of Proceedings
Defamation Media Law Ecclesiastical Law Human Rights Libel Non Justiciability Freedom of Religion Freedom of Expression +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Right Reverend Jonathan Clive Blake

Claimant

Associated Newspapers Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Action / Preliminary Issues Hearing on Justiciability and Stay

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court can adjudicate on the validity of the claimant's consecration as a bishop
  2. 2 Whether the action should be stayed due to non-justiciable issues

Ratio Decidendi

The action must be stayed because the core issues are non-justiciable; the court cannot determine the validity of the claimant's consecration as a bishop without entering forbidden territory of doctrinal and ecclesiastical matters, making a fair trial impossible.

Court Disposition

Action stayed

Orders

  • The action is stayed; proceedings cannot continue.