Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 2677 (QB) (11 November 2011)
The words complained of mean that there were, at the date of publication, reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Miller was a willing beneficiary of improper conduct and cronyism because of his friendship with Sir Ian Blair in respect of the award of Metropolitan Police Service contracts to Mr Miller's company, and that this is a defamatory meaning.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 2677 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Andrew James Miller; Defendant: Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action / Trial of Preliminary Issue as to Meaning
- Outcome
- Claimant succeeds on preliminary issue of meaning; words found to bear a defamatory meaning at Chase Level 2.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Meaning of Defamatory Words, Chase Levels of Meaning, Public Contracts, Cronyism
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew James Miller
Claimant
Associated Newspapers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Trial of Preliminary Issue as to Meaning
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of?
- 2 Do the words bear a defamatory meaning of the claimant?
- 3 At what Chase level do the imputations operate?
Ratio Decidendi
The words complained of mean that there were, at the date of publication, reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Miller was a willing beneficiary of improper conduct and cronyism because of his friendship with Sir Ian Blair in respect of the award of Metropolitan Police Service contracts to Mr Miller's company, and that this is a defamatory meaning.
Court Disposition
Claimant succeeds on preliminary issue of meaning; words found to bear a defamatory meaning at Chase Level 2.
Orders
- Declaration as to meaning: The words complained of mean there were reasonable grounds to suspect Mr Miller was a willing beneficiary of improper conduct and cronyism in respect of the award of Metropolitan Police Service contracts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment