Hanson v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 1048 (QB) (01 May 2020)
The Article's natural and ordinary meaning is that the Claimant, by supporting Vicki Paterson, subscribing to the idea that alleged victims must be believed, and befriending and associating with Beech, demonstrated a lack of professional judgement and gave unjustified credibility to Beech's fantasies, sharing responsibility for reputational and financial damage. By accepting a position on the Operation Conifer advisory panel after prejudging Heath's guilt, she demonstrated lack of impartiality and professional judgment. The underlined passages are opinion; the rest are fact. The meaning as a whole is defamatory due to the opinion expressed, not the factual allegations.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1048 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Eleanor Louise Hanson; Defendant: Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Claim / Determination of Preliminary Issues (meaning and Fact/opinion) Prior to Defence
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined: meaning and fact/opinion found as set out in judgment. No final determination of liability or damages at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Meaning of Publication, Fact Vs Opinion, Defamatory Meaning, Defamation Act 2013
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eleanor Louise Hanson
Claimant
Associated Newspapers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Claim / Determination of Preliminary Issues (meaning and Fact/opinion) Prior to Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the Article?
- 2 Are the words complained of statements of fact or opinion?
- 3 Did the Article indicate the basis of any opinion expressed?
Ratio Decidendi
The Article's natural and ordinary meaning is that the Claimant, by supporting Vicki Paterson, subscribing to the idea that alleged victims must be believed, and befriending and associating with Beech, demonstrated a lack of professional judgement and gave unjustified credibility to Beech's fantasies, sharing responsibility for reputational and financial damage. By accepting a position on the Operation Conifer advisory panel after prejudging Heath's guilt, she demonstrated lack of impartiality and professional judgment. The underlined passages are opinion; the rest are fact. The meaning as a whole is defamatory due to the opinion expressed, not the factual allegations.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined: meaning and fact/opinion found as set out in judgment. No final determination of liability or damages at this stage.
Orders
- The natural and ordinary meaning of the Article is as set out in the judgment, distinguishing fact and opinion.
- The Article's opinion statements indicate their basis as required by law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment