Sharif v Associated Newspapers Ltd (Rev 1) [2021] EWHC 343 (QB) (05 February 2021)
The Article, as understood by the ordinary reasonable reader, alleged that Mr Sharif was party to and the principal beneficiary of laundering tens of millions of pounds, proceeds of his embezzlement as Chief Minister of Punjab, including substantial British public money and corrupt payments from kickbacks or commissions. For Mr Yousaf, the Article alleged he knowingly received £1 million embezzled from earthquake relief funds and there were strong grounds to suspect he benefitted from further laundered payments. Both meanings are defamatory at common law. The meaning should focus on the Claimant personally, not extend to family members. Costs of the preliminary issue are to be costs in...
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 343
- Parties
- Claimant: Mian Muhammad Shabaz Sharif; Claimant: Imran Ali Yousaf; Defendant: Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation (libel) / Preliminary Issue Trial on Natural and Ordinary Meaning and Defamatory Tendency at Common Law
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue determined: natural and ordinary meanings found as set out in the judgment; both meanings are defamatory at common law; costs of the preliminary issue to be costs in the case.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Natural and Ordinary Meaning, Defamatory Tendency, Chase Levels, Repetition Rule, Costs in Preliminary Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mian Muhammad Shabaz Sharif
Claimant
Imran Ali Yousaf
Claimant
Associated Newspapers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation (libel) / Preliminary Issue Trial on Natural and Ordinary Meaning and Defamatory Tendency at Common Law
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the Article in respect of each Claimant?
- 2 Is the meaning defamatory of the Claimant at common law?
- 3 Should costs be awarded following the preliminary issue determination?
Ratio Decidendi
The Article, as understood by the ordinary reasonable reader, alleged that Mr Sharif was party to and the principal beneficiary of laundering tens of millions of pounds, proceeds of his embezzlement as Chief Minister of Punjab, including substantial British public money and corrupt payments from kickbacks or commissions. For Mr Yousaf, the Article alleged he knowingly received £1 million embezzled from earthquake relief funds and there were strong grounds to suspect he benefitted from further laundered payments. Both meanings are defamatory at common law. The meaning should focus on the Claimant personally, not extend to family members. Costs of the preliminary issue are to be costs in...
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue determined: natural and ordinary meanings found as set out in the judgment; both meanings are defamatory at common law; costs of the preliminary issue to be costs in the case.
Orders
- Natural and ordinary meaning of the Article determined for each Claimant as set out in the judgment.
- Both meanings held to be defamatory at common law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment