Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd
The words complained of meant that there were, at the date of publication, reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Miller was a willing beneficiary of improper conduct and cronyism because of his friendship with Sir Ian Blair in respect of the award of a number of Metropolitan Police Service contracts to Mr Miller’s company worth millions of pounds of public money, and that that is a meaning defamatory of Mr Miller.
- Parties
- Claimant: Andrew James Miller; Defendant: Associated Newspapers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action / Trial of Preliminary Issue on Meaning
- Outcome
- The words complained of bear a defamatory meaning at Chase Level 2.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Defamatory Meaning, Chase Levels, Cronyism, Public Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew James Miller
Claimant
Associated Newspapers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Trial of Preliminary Issue on Meaning
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of?
- 2 Do the words bear a defamatory meaning of the claimant?
- 3 At what Chase level is the imputation made?
Ratio Decidendi
The words complained of meant that there were, at the date of publication, reasonable grounds to suspect that Mr Miller was a willing beneficiary of improper conduct and cronyism because of his friendship with Sir Ian Blair in respect of the award of a number of Metropolitan Police Service contracts to Mr Miller’s company worth millions of pounds of public money, and that that is a meaning defamatory of Mr Miller.
Court Disposition
The words complained of bear a defamatory meaning at Chase Level 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment