Associated Newspapers Ltd. v Keith Burstein [2007] EWCA Civ 600 (22 June 2007)
The words complained of in the review are plainly comment, not fact, and are fair comment on a matter of public interest; the defence of fair comment must succeed and summary judgment should be entered for the defendant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 600
- Parties
- Appellant: Associated Newspapers Limited; Respondent: Keith Burstein
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal From Refusal of Summary Judgment in Libel Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; summary judgment entered for the defendant (Associated Newspapers Limited).
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Fair Comment, Summary Judgment, Defamatory Meaning, Public Interest
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Associated Newspapers Limited
Appellant
Keith Burstein
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From Refusal of Summary Judgment in Libel Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the words in the review are capable of bearing the defamatory meanings pleaded by the claimant
- 2 Whether the words are statements of fact or comment
- 3 Whether the defence of fair comment is made out
Ratio Decidendi
The words complained of in the review are plainly comment, not fact, and are fair comment on a matter of public interest; the defence of fair comment must succeed and summary judgment should be entered for the defendant.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; summary judgment entered for the defendant (Associated Newspapers Limited).
Orders
- Summary judgment for the defendant
- Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment