AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [2012] EWHC 2224 (QB) (31 July 2012)

AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [2012] EWHC 2224 (QB) (31 July 2012)

The claimant succeeded only on the issue of publication of photographs and was awarded damages exceeding the defendant's offer, but failed on the majority of the claim, including the siege and paternity issues. The conduct of the claimant's solicitors, particularly regarding evidence, was improper. Therefore, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] EWHC 2224 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: AAA; Defendant: Associated Newspapers Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Privacy/breach of Confidence / Judgment on Costs After Trial
Outcome
Claimant to pay 80% of defendant's costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Legal Topics
Breach of Privacy, Damages, Injunctions, Costs, Conditional Fee Agreements, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR
Privacy Law Media Law Civil Procedure Breach of Privacy Damages Injunctions Costs Conditional Fee Agreements +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AAA

Claimant

Associated Newspapers Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Privacy/breach of Confidence / Judgment on Costs After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached the claimant's privacy rights by publishing photographs and articles
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to damages for alleged siege and breach of privacy
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to an injunction restraining further publication

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant succeeded only on the issue of publication of photographs and was awarded damages exceeding the defendant's offer, but failed on the majority of the claim, including the siege and paternity issues. The conduct of the claimant's solicitors, particularly regarding evidence, was improper. Therefore, the claimant is to pay 80% of the defendant's costs, subject to detailed assessment.

Court Disposition

Claimant to pay 80% of defendant's costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.

Orders

  • Claimant to pay 80% of defendant's total costs
  • Costs to be subject to detailed assessment if not agreed