Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus

Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus

The phrase 'at the end of the period of your tenancy' is equivalent to 'after the end of the period of your tenancy' in the context of section 21(4) of the Housing Act 1988, and thus the notice is valid.

Parties
Claimant/applicant: Notting Hill Housing Trust; Defendant/respondent: Svetlana Roomus
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Assured Shorthold Tenancy, Section 21 Notice, Notice Requirements, Possession Proceedings
Landlord and Tenant Law Assured Shorthold Tenancy Section 21 Notice Notice Requirements Possession Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Notting Hill Housing Trust

Claimant/applicant

Svetlana Roomus

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a notice stating possession is required 'at the end of the period of your tenancy' satisfies section 21(4) of the Housing Act 1988

Ratio Decidendi

The phrase 'at the end of the period of your tenancy' is equivalent to 'after the end of the period of your tenancy' in the context of section 21(4) of the Housing Act 1988, and thus the notice is valid.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.