Njord Partners SMA-Seal LP & Ors v Astir Maritime Ltd & Ors
The court found that Tahir Lakhani knowingly made false representations as to his personal net worth and the reasons for delayed repayments, intending the lenders to rely on them, and that the lenders did so to their detriment. Ali Lakhani was found to have materially assisted in the preparation of the false asset statement and to have authorised or approved the use of his signature on further false statements, with knowledge or recklessness as to their falsity, and pursuant to a common design with Tahir. Both were found liable for deceit and conspiracy by unlawful means, causing loss to the lenders.
- Parties
- Claimant: Njord Partners SMA-SEAL LP; Claimant: NPSSF Debt Co. S. A. R. L.; Claimant: AIE III Investments, L. P; Claimant: Nordic Trustee A/S; Defendant: Astir Maritime Ltd; Defendant: Muhammad Tahir Lakhani; Defendant: Muhammad Ali Lakhani
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Commercial (tort, Fraud, Conspiracy) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimants against both Tahir and Ali Lakhani for deceit, accessory liability, and conspiracy. Quantum to be determined or agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Deceit (fraudulent Misrepresentation), Accessory Liability, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Guarantees and Indemnities, Facility Agreements, Director Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Njord Partners SMA-SEAL LP
Claimant
NPSSF Debt Co. S. A. R. L.
Claimant
AIE III Investments, L. P
Claimant
Nordic Trustee A/S
Claimant
Astir Maritime Ltd
Defendant
Muhammad Tahir Lakhani
Defendant
Muhammad Ali Lakhani
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial (tort, Fraud, Conspiracy) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations (deceit) to the lenders regarding asset ownership, value, and compliance with facility terms
- 2 Whether the defendants are liable for conspiracy by unlawful means
- 3 Whether the second defendant (Ali) is liable as an accessory to deceit
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Tahir Lakhani knowingly made false representations as to his personal net worth and the reasons for delayed repayments, intending the lenders to rely on them, and that the lenders did so to their detriment. Ali Lakhani was found to have materially assisted in the preparation of the false asset statement and to have authorised or approved the use of his signature on further false statements, with knowledge or recklessness as to their falsity, and pursuant to a common design with Tahir. Both were found liable for deceit and conspiracy by unlawful means, causing loss to the lenders.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimants against both Tahir and Ali Lakhani for deceit, accessory liability, and conspiracy. Quantum to be determined or agreed.
Orders
- Declaration of liability for deceit and conspiracy against Tahir and Ali Lakhani
- Damages to be assessed or agreed, with directions for submissions on quantum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment