Ranbaxy (UK) Ltd v Astrazeneca AB [2011] EWHC 1831 (Pat) (15 July 2011)
Claim 1, construed purposively in context, is directed to the use of magnesium esomeprazole with an optical purity of ≥ 99.8% e.e. for the manufacture of a medicament containing that active ingredient; Ranbaxy's product does not contain such compound and therefore does not infringe.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 1831 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: Ranbaxy (UK) Limited; Defendant: AstraZeneca AB
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Revocation / Judgment After Preliminary Trial on Infringement
- Outcome
- Declaration of non-infringement granted to Ranbaxy; AstraZeneca's counterclaim for infringement dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Interpretation, Swiss Form Claims, Second Medical Use, Infringement, Non Infringement, Therapeutic Use
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ranbaxy (UK) Limited
Claimant
AstraZeneca AB
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Revocation / Judgment After Preliminary Trial on Infringement
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper interpretation of claim 1 of EP 1 020 461
- 2 Scope of Swiss form claims
- 3 Whether Ranbaxy's product infringes the patent
Ratio Decidendi
Claim 1, construed purposively in context, is directed to the use of magnesium esomeprazole with an optical purity of ≥ 99.8% e.e. for the manufacture of a medicament containing that active ingredient; Ranbaxy's product does not contain such compound and therefore does not infringe.
Court Disposition
Declaration of non-infringement granted to Ranbaxy; AstraZeneca's counterclaim for infringement dismissed.
Orders
- Ranbaxy entitled to declaration of non-infringement.
- AstraZeneca's counterclaim for infringement fails.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment