Ali & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 846 (27 January 2006)
It is arguable that the Tribunal failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for concluding that the applicants, despite accepted past persecution, do not face a real risk of future persecution on return to Somalia, particularly in the absence of evidence of a significant change in country conditions.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 846
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Ms Mariam Muse Ali; Claimant/applicant: Ms Asha Muse Ali; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Refugee Status, Article 3 ECHR, Risk on Return, Past Persecution, Well Founded Fear
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Mariam Muse Ali
Claimant/applicant
Ms Asha Muse Ali
Claimant/applicant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal failed to give legally sufficient reasons for dismissing the appeal despite accepting past persecution
- 2 Whether the risk on return to Somalia for the applicants, as young single females, was adequately considered under Article 3 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
It is arguable that the Tribunal failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for concluding that the applicants, despite accepted past persecution, do not face a real risk of future persecution on return to Somalia, particularly in the absence of evidence of a significant change in country conditions.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Time for application extended
- Permission to appeal granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment