BR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Departement [2006] EWCA Civ 1766 (21 November 2006)
The tribunal's rejection of the applicant's and witness's credibility was justified and not undermined by failure to refer to specific documents; objective evidence did not establish that all doctors are at risk on return to Iraq absent individualised circumstances.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1766
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: BR (Iraq); Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Asylum and Human Rights Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Article 3 ECHR, Credibility Assessment, Risk on Return, Treatment of Professionals in Iraq
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BR (Iraq)
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Asylum and Human Rights Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal erred in failing to refer to documentary evidence relevant to credibility
- 2 Whether the tribunal failed to consider risk to the applicant as a medical practitioner on return to Iraq
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal's rejection of the applicant's and witness's credibility was justified and not undermined by failure to refer to specific documents; objective evidence did not establish that all doctors are at risk on return to Iraq absent individualised circumstances.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal refused
Orders
- application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment