BR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Departement [2006] EWCA Civ 1766 (21 November 2006)

BR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Departement [2006] EWCA Civ 1766 (21 November 2006)

The tribunal's rejection of the applicant's and witness's credibility was justified and not undermined by failure to refer to specific documents; objective evidence did not establish that all doctors are at risk on return to Iraq absent individualised circumstances.

Citation
[2006] EWCA Civ 1766
Parties
Claimant/appellant: BR (Iraq); Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Asylum and Human Rights Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Asylum, Article 3 ECHR, Credibility Assessment, Risk on Return, Treatment of Professionals in Iraq

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BR (Iraq)

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Asylum and Human Rights Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal erred in failing to refer to documentary evidence relevant to credibility
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal failed to consider risk to the applicant as a medical practitioner on return to Iraq

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal's rejection of the applicant's and witness's credibility was justified and not undermined by failure to refer to specific documents; objective evidence did not establish that all doctors are at risk on return to Iraq absent individualised circumstances.

Court Disposition

permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • application refused