Sandrasegarampillai v Secretary of State for the Home Department
The Tribunal's conclusion that the appellant was not a wanted man and would not be of adverse interest to the authorities on return to Sri Lanka was rationally supported by the facts, including his ability to move freely, lack of high profile, and absence from wanted lists. The failure to provide detailed reasoning did not amount to an error of law.
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Senthilrajan Sandrasegarampillai; Respondent/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Asylum Appeal / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Persecution, Risk Assessment, Credibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Senthilrajan Sandrasegarampillai
Applicant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Asylum Appeal / Appeal From Immigration Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant faces a real risk of persecution if returned to Sri Lanka
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in its assessment of the appellant's profile and risk
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to provide adequate reasoning for its conclusion
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's conclusion that the appellant was not a wanted man and would not be of adverse interest to the authorities on return to Sri Lanka was rationally supported by the facts, including his ability to move freely, lack of high profile, and absence from wanted lists. The failure to provide detailed reasoning did not amount to an error of law.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment