B v Secretary of State for the Home Department

B v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The Tribunal's decision to reject the appellant's account was not perverse and was supported by reasons; no error of law was discernible, and the appeal raised no true legal issue justifying interference.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: B; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Asylum and Immigration Appeal / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Credibility Assessment, Error of Law, Appeal Procedure
Immigration Human Rights Asylum Credibility Assessment Error of Law Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B

Claimant/appellant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Asylum and Immigration Appeal / Appeal From Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by rejecting the appellant's account without adequate reasons
  2. 2 Whether corroborative evidence was properly considered
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal's decision was perverse or unsupported by evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's decision to reject the appellant's account was not perverse and was supported by reasons; no error of law was discernible, and the appeal raised no true legal issue justifying interference.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.