AT v SS
The separation of S from his mother and placement in foster care in Holland, consequent upon an order for return, does not expose S to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm or otherwise place him in an intolerable situation for the purposes of Article 13(b), given the protective measures available in Holland. The mother’s refusal to return with S does not satisfy the narrow exception under Article 13(b).
- Parties
- Applicant: AT; Respondent: SS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Child Abduction (hague Convention) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Return order granted
- Legal Topics
- International Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Parental Responsibility, Summary Return, Protective Measures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AT
Applicant
SS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction (hague Convention) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summary return of S to Holland would expose S to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm or otherwise place him in an intolerable situation under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The separation of S from his mother and placement in foster care in Holland, consequent upon an order for return, does not expose S to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm or otherwise place him in an intolerable situation for the purposes of Article 13(b), given the protective measures available in Holland. The mother’s refusal to return with S does not satisfy the narrow exception under Article 13(b).
Court Disposition
Return order granted
Orders
- Order for the return of S to the jurisdiction of Holland pursuant to Article 12 of the Hague Convention
- Penal notice attached to the return order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment