Nualpenyai, R v
The original starting point of eight years for the trafficking offences was too high given the Sentencing Guidelines and the facts; an appropriate starting point was between six and six and a half years, and after credit for guilty plea and mitigation, sentences of five years were substituted for counts 2 and 3.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Atchara Nualpenyai
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation, Controlling Prostitution for Gain, Drug Possession, Sentencing Guidelines, Personal Mitigation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Atchara Nualpenyai
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the sentence imposed was excessive in light of sentencing guidelines
- 2 whether sufficient credit was given for guilty pleas and personal mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The original starting point of eight years for the trafficking offences was too high given the Sentencing Guidelines and the facts; an appropriate starting point was between six and six and a half years, and after credit for guilty plea and mitigation, sentences of five years were substituted for counts 2 and 3.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- sentences of six and a half years on counts 2 and 3 quashed and substituted with five years each
- other sentences remain unchanged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment