Athanasios Kandias v Information Commissioner

Athanasios Kandias v Information Commissioner

The Tribunal cannot make an order to progress the complaint as it has already been dealt with, and has no jurisdiction to consider the merits or substantive outcome under section 166 DPA. There is no reasonable prospect of the case succeeding.

Parties
Applicant: Athanasios Kandias; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 166(2) Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Decision
Outcome
Struck out
Legal Topics
Section 166 DPA Applications, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Procedural Remedies, Subject Access Requests
Data Protection Information Rights Section 166 DPA Applications Tribunal Jurisdiction Procedural Remedies Subject Access Requests

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Athanasios Kandias

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Section 166(2) Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal can grant the remedies sought under section 166 DPA
  2. 2 Whether the application should be struck out for no reasonable prospect of success

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal cannot make an order to progress the complaint as it has already been dealt with, and has no jurisdiction to consider the merits or substantive outcome under section 166 DPA. There is no reasonable prospect of the case succeeding.

Court Disposition

Struck out

Orders

  • The proceedings are struck out under Rule 8(3)(c) because there is no reasonable prospect of the Applicant's case, or part of it, succeeding.