Cartus Corporation v Atlantic Mobility Ltd [2014] EWHC 2868 (QB) (22 August 2014)
AML failed to comply within a reasonable period with Cartus' demands for delivery up, creating suspicion and provoking litigation; Cartus was justified in issuing proceedings and is entitled to 90% of its costs. Joinder of Wayne Sidell for non-party costs is ordered.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 2868 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Cartus Corporation; Defendant: Atlantic Mobility Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs in Delivery Up Proceedings / Post Adjournment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Cartus awarded 90% of its costs of the application for delivery up, including costs of present application. Wayne Sidell joined for purposes of non-party costs order.
- Legal Topics
- Bailment, Conversion, Assignment of Contracts, Non Party Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cartus Corporation
Claimant
Atlantic Mobility Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs in Delivery Up Proceedings / Post Adjournment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether AML wrongfully detained goods and failed to deliver up on demand
- 2 Whether Cartus had immediate right to possession
- 3 Whether AML's conduct justified litigation and costs
Ratio Decidendi
AML failed to comply within a reasonable period with Cartus' demands for delivery up, creating suspicion and provoking litigation; Cartus was justified in issuing proceedings and is entitled to 90% of its costs. Joinder of Wayne Sidell for non-party costs is ordered.
Court Disposition
Cartus awarded 90% of its costs of the application for delivery up, including costs of present application. Wayne Sidell joined for purposes of non-party costs order.
Orders
- Cartus to recover 90% of its costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
- Wayne Sidell to be joined for non-party costs application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment