Lord Ashcroft v Attorney General & Anor [2002] EWHC 1122 (QB) (31 May 2002)
Permission to re-amend the Particulars of Claim is granted in part: amendments introducing claims under the Data Protection Act 1998 and for misfeasance in public office (reckless indifference form) are arguable and allowed; claims under the Data Protection Act 1984 are limited to section 23; certain paragraphs and heads of damage are disallowed as irrelevant, speculative, or disproportionate; claims for aggravated damages are allowed only to the extent they rely on statements by the defendants, not third parties.
- Citation
- [2002] EWHC 1122 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Lord Ashcroft; Defendant: Attorney General; Defendant: Department for International Development
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Permission to Re Amend Particulars of Claim and for Further Disclosure
- Outcome
- Application to re-amend Particulars of Claim allowed in part and refused in part; application for further disclosure adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Breach of Confidence, Breach of Statutory Duty, Data Protection Act 1984, Data Protection Act 1998, Misfeasance in Public Office, Human Rights Act 1998, Damages, Aggravated Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lord Ashcroft
Claimant
Attorney General
Defendant
Department for International Development
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Permission to Re Amend Particulars of Claim and for Further Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be permitted to re-amend the Particulars of Claim to introduce new causes of action and claims for damages under the Data Protection Acts 1984 and 1998 and for misfeasance in public office; whether certain paragraphs of the draft re-amended pleading are legally valid or proportionate; whether claims for aggravated damages and distress are properly pleaded.
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to re-amend the Particulars of Claim is granted in part: amendments introducing claims under the Data Protection Act 1998 and for misfeasance in public office (reckless indifference form) are arguable and allowed; claims under the Data Protection Act 1984 are limited to section 23; certain paragraphs and heads of damage are disallowed as irrelevant, speculative, or disproportionate; claims for aggravated damages are allowed only to the extent they rely on statements by the defendants, not third parties.
Court Disposition
Application to re-amend Particulars of Claim allowed in part and refused in part; application for further disclosure adjourned.
Orders
- Paragraph 4.2.3(a) to be deleted.
- Paragraphs 5.3, 5.4, 5.7, 10 and 15 to be revised to limit 1984 Act claims to section 23.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment