Wheeler, R v [1997] EWCA Crim 1032 (29 April 1997)
For arson being reckless as to whether life would be endangered, an immediate and severe custodial sentence is required unless there are exceptional circumstances or mental health issues; the original non-custodial sentence was unduly lenient and substituted with a custodial term.
- Citation
- [1997] EWCA Crim 1032
- Parties
- Applicant: Attorney General; Offender: Glen Wheeler
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Sentence Review on Ground of Undue Leniency
- Outcome
- Original sentence quashed; substituted with four-and-a-half years' imprisonment.
- Legal Topics
- Arson, Sentencing, Recklessness, Endangerment of Life
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Applicant
Glen Wheeler
Offender
Procedural Posture
Attorney General's Reference (criminal) / Sentence Review on Ground of Undue Leniency
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for arson being reckless as to whether life would be endangered was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether immediate imprisonment is mandatory for such offences absent exceptional circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
For arson being reckless as to whether life would be endangered, an immediate and severe custodial sentence is required unless there are exceptional circumstances or mental health issues; the original non-custodial sentence was unduly lenient and substituted with a custodial term.
Court Disposition
Original sentence quashed; substituted with four-and-a-half years' imprisonment.
Orders
- Offender to serve four-and-a-half years' imprisonment from date of surrender.
- Offender to surrender to West Bromwich Police Station within 48 hours.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment